#jellyload

3 posts · Last used Jan 29

Back to Timeline
Thread context 2 posts in path
Parent @StefanoGaivota@universeodon.com Open
@StefanoGaivota@universeodon.com
Oakee doakee... Got the prints back. Sphere retention is a bit too tight with these dimensions. It takes significant force to engage sphere. Will adjust octagon dimensions for greater accommodation. (
Current reply
@StefanoGaivota@universeodon.com · Jan 29, 2026
Having gone through the batch, it seems that, (as the Smiths never sang): "Some Prints are Tighter than Others" I will leave the model as it is and folks can make their own accommodation one way or another. #JellyLoad #Maker #RetroComputing #Optics #Hardware #3Dprinting
View full thread on universeodon.com
0
1
0
@StefanoGaivota@universeodon.com · Jan 21, 2026
Experimenting with sphere retention structures which can be more reliably manufactured using FDM processes. It's "The Octagons" this time! Updated the Git to reflect this latest attempt. https://github.com/StefanoGaivota/Optical-Data-Channel-JellyLoad-Hardware #JellyLoad #3Dprinting #Maker #Optics #RetroComputing
View on universeodon.com
4
0
2
@StefanoGaivota@universeodon.com · Jan 29, 2026
Oakee doakee... Got the prints back. Sphere retention is a bit too tight with these dimensions. It takes significant force to engage sphere. Will adjust octagon dimensions for greater accommodation. (Can you tell I'm nervous about videoing the process?) #3Dprinting #JellyLoad #Maker #RetroComputing #Optics #Hardware
View on universeodon.com
0
2
1

You've seen all posts