• Sign in
  • Sign up
Elektrine
EN
Log in Register
Modes
Overview Chat Timeline Communities Gallery Lists Friends Email Vault DNS VPN
Back to Timeline !technology @EisFrei
In reply to 6 earlier posts
@schizoidman@lemmy.zip on lemmy.zip Open parent
'It doesn’t catch fire': Why China’s "fireproof" sodium battery could be the breakthrough that makes EVs safer than ICE cars

cross-posted from : lemmy.zip/post/62209262

Open parent Original URL
663
0
204
@SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net on slrpnk.net Open parent
I thought sodium batteries had considerably less energy density than conventional? Is that not a problem anymore?
Open parent Original URL
0
0
4
@EisFrei@lemmy.world on lemmy.world Open parent
They indeed have less energy density, but I don’t get your point about less safety. They work better in high and low temperatures, can be charged a lot faster and don’t degrade as fast. Sodium isn’t as reactive as Lithium, lowering the risk of fires.
Open parent Original URL
0
0
2
@SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net on slrpnk.net Open parent
My point is that if they have less energy density, they aren’t a particularity great choice for EVs, as the increased battery size to get the same capacity makes the whole thing much heavier, requiring even more battery to move it. I guess for like short range vehicles, it might be fine, but at least around here, thats gunna be a pretty tough sell, because everything is spread out. It can’t really make EVs safer if its not being used for them due to the drawbacks, is all.
Open parent Original URL
0
0
1
@nucleative@lemmy.world on lemmy.world Open parent
ICE engines use a bunch of physical space for accessory components related to the engine. Li-ion powered e-cars reclaimed a ton of that space (i.e. Tesla has a frunk) Perhaps next using a bit more space for a less dense sodium battery in exchange for a vehicle that is 0% explodable is a worthy trade (if claims are true).
Open parent Original URL
0
0
2
@encelado748@feddit.org on feddit.org Open parent
Battery density is energy per kilos. The problem is not only were to put the battery, but also the added weight.
Open parent Original URL
0
0
0
0
EisFrei
EisFrei in !technology
@EisFrei@lemmy.world · 9d
Leave the weight as it’s, accept lower range which is offset by faster charging speeds. Or just buy a car with a lithium battery if you cannot accept this.
View on lemmy.world
0
2
0
Sign in to interact

Comments (2)

Showing 0 of 2 cached locally.
Syncing comments from the remote thread. 2 more replies are still loading.

Loading comments...

About Community

technology
Technology
!technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules
  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots
  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
83904
Members
18817
Posts
Created: June 11, 2023
View All Posts
313k7r1n3

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • VPN Policy

Email Settings

IMAP: mail.elektrine.com:993

POP3: pop3.elektrine.com:995

SMTP: mail.elektrine.com:465

SSL/TLS required

Support

  • support@elektrine.com
  • Report Security Issue

Connect

Tor Hidden Service

khav7sdajxu6om3arvglevskg2vwuy7luyjcwfwg6xnkd7qtskr2vhad.onion
© 2026 Elektrine. All rights reserved. • Server: 07:22:08 UTC