• Sign in
  • Sign up
Elektrine
EN
Log in Register
Modes
Overview Chat Timeline Communities Gallery Lists Friends Email Vault DNS VPN
Back to Timeline !memes @moonshadow
In reply to 5 earlier posts
@Confidant6198@lemmy.ml on lemmy.ml Open parent
Open parent Original URL
149
0
66
@moonshadow@slrpnk.net on slrpnk.net Open parent
Curse this ai slop. The fake crayon thing is really bugging me, like. Crack open a box and put a few hours in if you mean it, super accessible style
Open parent Original URL
0
0
0
@Cowbee@lemmy.ml on lemmy.ml Open parent
There’s absolutely no reason why this short, simplistic agitprop needs to be made in artisinal fashion from a Marxist perspective. Labor hours saved is valuable, and nobody is enjoying this agitprop from the perspective of artistic analysis. AI cannot replace art, but the insistence that every graphic regardless of use-case be made in artisinal fashion is reactionary.
Open parent Original URL
0
0
0
@moonshadow@slrpnk.net on slrpnk.net Open parent
From a human perspective it’s icky and you come across like 1950s propaganda to make commies look bad. When people express themselves they… you know what, I’m just gonna leave it at “ai sucks”. Simulated human output, our entire selves slurped up and analyzed to be extruded by a corporation, if your self-defined “marxist perspective” has an excuse for that it can eat my ass
Open parent Original URL
0
0
0
@Cowbee@lemmy.ml on lemmy.ml Open parent
Your only complaints are: “It’s icky” "ai sucks" The image itself is generated, rather than artisinally created The first 2 are non-points to begin with, and the latter is an incomplete point. Again, there is absolutely no reason why this image needs to be artisinally created. Had OP used wordart and grabbed a stock image online for the background, it would have had the same amount of human input but no AI, yet you wouldn’t be calling it into question. Nobody present is trying to tell you that AI can replace artists making art. You’re making the same mistakes the Luddites did in blaming machinery for the ills of capitalism, rather than capitalism itself. The same argument was had when digital art became mainstream over hand-drawn art, and when cameras came into being. Neither digital art nor cameras have replaced traditional art, nor can they, but that doesn’t mean digital art and cameras don’t have legitimate use cases. AI has limitations that AI fanatics lie about. AI also has use-cases that people try their hardest to deny. Marxism helps us understand that AI can never replace traditonal art, but can absolutely be used for things like agitprop or stock images.
Open parent Original URL
0
0
0
0
moonshadow in !memes
@moonshadow@slrpnk.net · Dec 11
Your only point is: If it supports my ideology it’s good
View on slrpnk.net
0
0
0
Sign in to interact

Loading comments...

About Community

memes
Memes
!memes@lemmy.ml
Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.

  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.


55473
Members
17003
Posts
Created: April 25, 2019
View All Posts
313k7r1n3

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • VPN Policy

Email Settings

IMAP: mail.elektrine.com:993

POP3: pop3.elektrine.com:995

SMTP: mail.elektrine.com:465

SSL/TLS required

Support

  • support@elektrine.com
  • Report Security Issue

Connect

Tor Hidden Service

khav7sdajxu6om3arvglevskg2vwuy7luyjcwfwg6xnkd7qtskr2vhad.onion
© 2026 Elektrine. All rights reserved. • Server: 22:36:49 UTC