frongt

It’s still tolerably warm, and there are no other kettles that would be worth switching to right now. I use Firefox and if it ever popped an AI feature at me, I turned it off a long time ago and haven’t thought about it since.

They are, but that’s only for the search engine thing. Unless Google has a seat on the board.

You can’t send them to surplus auction?

They definitely have. The smaller form factor is better for laptops, and if you can share parts between laptop and desktop it’s cheaper.

M.2 is just a connector, you can run SATA over M.2. But you’re right, freeing up 2.5" production for M.2 should reduce price pressure.

Even your comments stink of chatgpt

Make the data centers build their own power plants. Then they get all the risk and all the reward. In theory it’s great. In practice it’s “oops we had a big spill and went out of business, guess the EPA will have to use taxpayer money”.

There’s a difference between refusing to testify and actively destroying information. And the current federal courts are not friendly to civil rights, either.

Google wants to be able to recognize and remove it. They don’t want the FBI all up in their business.

The standard for a search at a port of entry is lower. I don’t know how much it’s been tested in court, but that’s how they’re operating right now.

If you did it in response to an attempted seizure, they’d probably charge you for that too.

It’s CBP, probably at the airport, so I don’t think you’d find a court saying they exceeded their authority in seizing the phone for search. They have very broad authority. It’s not ethical at all, of course, but it’s been perfectly legal for decades, under multiple administrations.

Not really, no. You have the right to not give testimony against yourself, including by not providing evidence that would hurt you, but that doesn’t mean you can actively destroy evidence.

No costs will be offset by this. The device will be replaced multiple times before it ever breaks even on the implementation cost.

The cost of installing the generator and wiring is far higher than the energy recouped.

euractiv.com/…/far-right-makes-strides-in-swedish… You don’t live in a vacuum.

Four words seems a fair metric for the shortest descriptive headline. I mean, can you beat “Foot Heads Arms Body”? The only shorter ones are “man bites dog”, “Dewey defeats Truman”, or something as simple as “WAR” when everyone already knows the details and this is just the official announcement.

Possibly. The BBC made a big row about Apple’s headlines: www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2v778x85yo

en.wikipedia.org/…/Generative_adversarial_network

And regional communities. There’s not nearly enough people in the fediverse to support city or state communities. And only the most populous countries.

It’s blogspam. You can click through to the original article. It only happens in certain environments.

I agree. I think ansible is great in principle, but the documentation is severely lacking. Like it’ll tell you to set a value, but not whether it’s supposed to be in yaml, environment, or something else. And if it’s in yaml, it doesn’t tell you the required context to make it valid. But when someone has taken all the documentation, all the tutorials, the articles, the example code, working code, and stack overflow answers and put them all into a blender, often a useful answer comes out.

Written by Copilot and passes the tests also written by Copilot.

pbs.org/…/france-will-investigate-musks-grok-afte…