In reply to
Daniel J. Bernstein
@djb@mastodon.cr.yp.to
Designing cryptography (deployed now: X25519, Ed25519, ChaCha20, sntrup, Classic McEliece) to proactively reduce risks. Coined phrase "post-quantum" in 2003.
mastodon.cr.yp.to
Daniel J. Bernstein
@djb@mastodon.cr.yp.to
Designing cryptography (deployed now: X25519, Ed25519, ChaCha20, sntrup, Classic McEliece) to proactively reduce risks. Coined phrase "post-quantum" in 2003.
mastodon.cr.yp.to
@djb@mastodon.cr.yp.to
·
4d ago
@huitema@social.secret-wg.org @paulehoffman@infosec.exchange @rsalz@ioc.exchange It's important to distinguish the non-controversial part (rolling out a PQ layer) from the controversial part (_removing_ the existing ECC layer rather than _supplementing_ the existing ECC layer). Saying that the objection is to "promoting an unproven algorithm" misunderstands what's actually at issue. Same for lumping both parts together into a combined "approach" and saying the objection is to that.
View full thread on mastodon.cr.yp.to
1
1
0
Conversation (1)
Showing 0 of 1 cached locally.
Syncing comments from the remote thread. 1 more reply is still loading.
Loading comments...