In reply to
kasperd
@kasperd@westergaard.social
Currently testing this platform to decide whether it's the future of social networking. Curriculum Vitae: PhD degree from Aarhus University Worked at Google Zürich and London Partner at Intempus Timeregistrering - until it was acquired by Visma Operating nat64.net/
westergaard.social
kasperd
@kasperd@westergaard.social
Currently testing this platform to decide whether it's the future of social networking. Curriculum Vitae: PhD degree from Aarhus University Worked at Google Zürich and London Partner at Intempus Timeregistrering - until it was acquired by Visma Operating nat64.net/
westergaard.social
@kasperd@westergaard.social
·
Apr 05, 2026
I don’t recall if it attempted falling back to TCP. There was no blocking on the network where the DNS recursor was hosted. But many authoritative DNS servers lack TCP support. In any case it also failed resolution with authoritative servers that did support TCP.
What I do recall observing was that the BIND 9 recursor would try all of the different authoritative DNS servers one after each other. It would simply ignore every DNS response if it had taken more than one second to arrive. Even after having received and ignored perfectly valid DNS responses it would keep sending more DNS requests over UDP to other authoritative servers for the domain.
View full thread on westergaard.social
1
0
0
Loading comments...