In reply to
Kay Ohtie 🔜 FWA
@KayOhtie@blimps.xyz
Canis Lat(ex)rans Inflatus! (inflatable latex coyote) Some kind of weird 🎈
. Late 30's,
,
,
🔞 Yapping at my beloved walfdog! 🧡🧡 @mathias 🧡🧡 Baker, and learning guitar slowly! Expect art and rambling about furry inflation, macro growth, latex, and nerdy nonsense. Blimps.xyz admin; I help keep this place bouncy!
blimps.xyz
Kay Ohtie 🔜 FWA
@KayOhtie@blimps.xyz
Canis Lat(ex)rans Inflatus! (inflatable latex coyote) Some kind of weird 🎈
. Late 30's,
,
,
🔞 Yapping at my beloved walfdog! 🧡🧡 @mathias 🧡🧡 Baker, and learning guitar slowly! Expect art and rambling about furry inflation, macro growth, latex, and nerdy nonsense. Blimps.xyz admin; I help keep this place bouncy!
blimps.xyz
@KayOhtie@blimps.xyz
·
Apr 05, 2026
@zuthal @Li @fizzyizzy05 @0x4d6165 But that's the question, how do you define that? What about an arrangement that shouldn't be read that way but looks like it could?
I personally find the take of "reasonable sighted reader", even as a sighted reader, to be dismissive of the purpose of the characters in their usual context.
I think the real fix is for more platforms to offer text formatting for posts and maybe even display names. It doesn't solve everyone doing it for weirder looking characters but it at least solves the reasons most people use the bold or italic or strike through looking characters -- because they can't merely use underscores, slashes, or asterisks for formatting it.
View full thread on blimps.xyz
1
1
0
Conversation (1)
Showing 0 of 1 cached locally.
Syncing comments from the remote thread. 1 more reply is still loading.
Loading comments...