In reply to
Paul Wouters 🇪🇺🇨🇦
@letoams@defcon.social
Aiven Security Architect Former two term IETF Security Area Director, IESG Opensource dev: libreswan, Fedora, etc (see github) NIST SP800-77 Rev.1 author RDRonline player
defcon.social
Paul Wouters 🇪🇺🇨🇦
@letoams@defcon.social
Aiven Security Architect Former two term IETF Security Area Director, IESG Opensource dev: libreswan, Fedora, etc (see github) NIST SP800-77 Rev.1 author RDRonline player
defcon.social
@letoams@defcon.social
·
4d ago
@djb @huitema @paulehoffman @rsalz the analogy is of course ridiculously broken because everyone is building towards and expecting the future to be PQ only.
A better comparison is a scenario where we mandate hybrid cars because perhaps EV technology will fail in the future, even though we know eventually everyone will drive a pure EV.
Some people now prefer gas, some hybrid, some EV. We let people choose because non of the car variants are dangerous.
You are trying to force hybrid cars on everyone because you think EV might break despite years of research of the worlds best experts.
View full thread on defcon.social
0
1
0
Conversation (1)
Showing 0 of 1 cached locally.
Syncing comments from the remote thread. 1 more reply is still loading.
Loading comments...