@CyReVolt I was glib, sure. But I don‘t know how one can read this passage differently: Any agreement will have to address the concerns raised by Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programme, and its actions obstructing the navigation through the Strait of Hormuz. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz is greatly damaging, and the restoration of the freedom of navigation is of paramount importance for us. We are also worried that the continued strikes on Lebanon threaten to derail the entire process. We are mobilising ReliefEU stocks to provide immediate aid to the Lebanese people, but no amount of aid can replace the safety of a permanent peace. Sorry, but I‘m exasperated that no one in the big institutions even wants to name the instigating parties. (And no, I do not like the Iranian government one bit and they should be deposed but in this case they are defending themselves.)