In reply to
Snep
@snep@y.diskcat.com
he/him :: 24y/o :: festival networking sysadmin, computer enthusiast and furry from Hamburg, Germany :: Speaks Ger/Eng :: Meoww! Follow requests are on only because of annoying bots that think it's acceptable to do OPT-OUT data collection instead of OPT-IN, feel free to follow
y.diskcat.com
Snep
@snep@y.diskcat.com
he/him :: 24y/o :: festival networking sysadmin, computer enthusiast and furry from Hamburg, Germany :: Speaks Ger/Eng :: Meoww! Follow requests are on only because of annoying bots that think it's acceptable to do OPT-OUT data collection instead of OPT-IN, feel free to follow
y.diskcat.com
@snep@y.diskcat.com
·
Mar 23, 2026
@CursedSilicon Mmyup! IIRC even the official Intel article about CNVi has a disclamer at the bottom about only working with specifically designed boards which support CNVi.
I assume it's half a cent cheaper to throw a few more transistors into the PCH and add a couple of extra PCB traces or whatever the actual hardware change may be combined with a very stripped down wireless card that's basically just some RF magic than to use a full PCIe and USB WiFi/Bluetooth module
View full thread on y.diskcat.com
1
2
0
Conversation (2)
Showing 0 of 2 cached locally.
Syncing comments from the remote thread. 2 more replies are still loading.
Loading comments...