• Sign in
  • Sign up
Elektrine
EN
Log in Register
Modes
Overview Chat Timeline Communities Gallery Lists Friends Email Vault DNS VPN
Back to Timeline !linux @jollyrogue
In reply to 3 earlier posts
@mlxdy@lemmy.world on lemmy.world Open parent
What sense is licensing operating system on BSD license?
Change my mind. Companies are just taking BSD code and don’t contribute to it. At the end they’re selecting Linux even if there’s licensing risk and they have contribute to code. Why? Because Linux have a lot of contributors, that makes it much more advanced system with more features. Also companies which want to support Linux don’t have to worry that someone would close their code or code they funded with money. It’s not about competition but collaboration. GPL license allowed us also to sell own open-source solutions. FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD are behind Linux. I love that systems (especially OpenBSD), but I don’t see a point in contributing or donating to them. Instead of being ready to use solutions they’re trying to be base for commercial closed-source products and it would be great as contributors could get something from that, but they get nothing. I understand that BSD see closed source as something cool and way to commercialize software, but in today times where a lot of devices have 24/7 access to internet, microphones, cameras and at the same time to sensitive data it’s extremely dangerous. Closed source is used to hide backdoors, acts of surveillance and keeping monopoly on market which obviously stop evolution of software. Please tell me how BSD license can be good solution for operating system. It’s not about offending BSD, but as someone who love open source software I hate closed source software I would like to know how I can defend this license.
Open parent Original URL
58
1
28
@jollyrogue@lemmy.ml on lemmy.ml Open parent
Please tell me how BSD license can be good solution for operating system. The code is still open, and the repos will still exist if a fork is created. Sony forks FreeBSD for PS6, and nothing happens to FreeBSD. It still exists, and it still works. The added bonus is not having to deal with Sony, or other people, trying to upstream stuff that doesn’t make sense outside of the PS environment and would have questionable value to others. There are lots of ways companies get around the GPL, and most are GPL sanctioned. Starting a company, use the GPL. Starting a project for fun, use whatever because the companies are going to steal it anyway if it’s good.
Open parent Original URL
0
0
2
@tomalley8342@lemmy.world on lemmy.world Open parent
The added bonus is not having to deal with Sony, or other people, trying to upstream stuff that doesn’t make sense outside of the PS environment and would have questionable value to others. GPL doesn’t force people to merge back to upstream, and BSD doesn’t have any special way to stop people from trying to upstream
Open parent Original URL
0
0
1
0
jollyrogue in !linux
@jollyrogue@lemmy.ml · Mar 05
Fair, the patches don’t have to be accepted. 🙂 Would it be bound by the GPL? Companies love writing shims, and the Linux kernel is pro-business. It is specifically GPLv2 to allow companies to use it in closed source applications. TiVo is the poster child for this. Anything running in user space isn’t considered a derivative work. The kernel ABI specifically allows for this. A closed source application could run on top of the Linux kernel and not have to be released. Applications linking to a GPL library, glibc excluded, would have to be released since that would constitute a derivative work. I’m the PS6 scenario, we would probably get very little usable code. The GPL is old, and companies have had lots of time to work around it.
View on lemmy.ml
0
0
0
Sign in to interact

Loading comments...

About Community

linux
Linux
!linux@lemmy.ml

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules
  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
  • !opensource@lemmy.ml
  • !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
  • !technology@lemmy.ml
  • !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

64673
Members
10906
Posts
Created: June 01, 2019
View All Posts
313k7r1n3

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • VPN Policy

Email Settings

IMAP: mail.elektrine.com:993

POP3: pop3.elektrine.com:995

SMTP: mail.elektrine.com:465

SSL/TLS required

Support

  • support@elektrine.com
  • Report Security Issue

Connect

Tor Hidden Service

khav7sdajxu6om3arvglevskg2vwuy7luyjcwfwg6xnkd7qtskr2vhad.onion
© 2026 Elektrine. All rights reserved. • Server: 10:06:41 UTC