Fuck serif fonts. The point is to communicate clearly. Not look pretty and fancy-pants.

I agree with you and think it’s worthwhile to critically evaluate fonts. So what happens if we evaluate cursive font? Well, for most people, loopy cursive is hard to read. To understand why loopy cursive is problematic, here’s an excerpt from two experts on handwriting: Conventional looped cursive has not held up to modern life and is being abandoned by most adults, because Its decorative loops and excessive joins obscure visual cues, It loses legibility when written quickly, It doesn’t reflect the writing we see in type or on screen, and 100% joined writing is typically slower and no more legible than writing that joins most, but not all letters. So loopy cursive sucks, but does that mean that we should straight up ditch cursive altogether? Are there fonts that are quick to write and legible? Turns out, those same experts built a handwriting system, the Getty-Dubay system. Their writing system does not seek to “look pretty and fancy-pants” (to quote you). Instead, their writing system tries to “communicate clearly” (to quote you again). They built something logical and pragmatic. How can you be sure of what I’m saying? Well, you be the judge! Here’s a picture of the Getty-Dubay fonts, both print and cursive: Here’s a comparison of different cursive fonts: If you want more information, here’s a resource you can check out: handwritingsuccess.com/why-cursive/ So yeah, the way I see it, loopy cursive is hell, and italic-based cursive is the best of both worlds: fast to write and easy to read.