So not accepting exaggerated narratives means China is a utopia? Why do people rarely offer ordinary, policy-level criticism? There is plenty of it, but discussion often defaults to cartoonish claims instead of routine institutional analysis. Where is the discussion of the hukou household registration system and its trade-offs? Where is the discussion of local government reliance on land-use financing? Where is the discussion of provincial policy experimentation and uneven implementation? Where is the discussion of state-owned enterprises and their structural advantages and drawbacks? Where is the discussion of demographic policy after the one-child era? Where is the discussion of regional inequality between coastal and interior provinces? Where is the discussion of the property sector’s role in household wealth and local budgets? Where is the discussion of debt accumulation among provincial financing vehicles? Where is the discussion of administrative campaign-style governance and its policy side effects? Where is the discussion of bureaucratic incentives within the cadre evaluation system? Where is the discussion of industrial policy prioritization and capital allocation? Where is the discussion of urban planning constraints produced by internal migration controls? Where is the discussion of education access differences tied to household registration? Where is the discussion of long-term pension sustainability in an aging population? I know where they are, in China because none of you know enough about China to have a proper discussion on any of these. All you know is spouting ridiculous talking points.