Hello it's grumpy doriane that is going to die on her hill of fuck AI and is about to lecture everyone with her new little tale.

Something i sometimes hear (from people who are mostly against uses of LLM for say artistic practice) is that for the boring annoying stuff like administrative hell if it can help let's use it. Because there is no point in romanticising this type of task that was made with the intention to be an obstacle (legal or medical application, whatever). And I get, if it help it help.

But i am worried that individual shortcuts (like GPT prompt and summary) in laborious task can, in the long term, participate to normalise the inhuman obstacle they are. If more people make it through admin hell by using AI while laws and system worsen in the rise of fascism, it gives excuses to set it as the new expectation for all people. Individuals shortcut in masses impacts collective systems evolutions.
It's a similar story than with any automatisation of labor we can think of: it creates unhuman standards for the other humans that doesn't have the automatisation.

I say individual because, as much as it can be a survival or necessary tactic, there is a tendency, or a temptation, to make us falsely believe it has been solved because we solved it for ourselve, thanks to a technique.