• Sign in
  • Sign up
Elektrine
EN
Log in Register
Modes
Overview Chat Timeline Communities Gallery Lists Friends Email Vault DNS VPN
Back to Timeline !climate @grue
In reply to 6 earlier posts
@Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world on lemmy.world Open parent
I will not buy an induction stove unless I know why it’s pulse width modulation is.
Open parent Original URL
0
0
2
@CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de on discuss.tchncs.de Open parent
PWM is vital; I can melt chocolate on my stove today but “low” often is 100% power at 90% off 10% on and burns food. Also making sure the boards and chips are hefty enough. I don’t trust Samsung and LG to lay enough of a trace on the board or use a sufficiently large heatsink on the switching circuitry that it’s not going to melt through when I boil water daily. I don’t recall details but last time I was looking into it, even some higher end brands had failure rates after 5-10 years (or sooner if the “power boost” or whatever was used because they cheaped out. My gas stove will survive the apocalypse, but whether it survives the Operation Epic Fail is another thing.
Open parent Original URL
0
0
0
@Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world on lemmy.world Open parent
Damn, I didn’t even think that these are also made as cheaply as possible and in a way that makes them unrepairable. It’s a lot like electric cars: I get that they’re better but I don’t trust any company to make one that doesn’t do something shitty.
Open parent Original URL
0
0
0
@supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz on sopuli.xyz Open parent
It’s a lot like electric cars: I get that they’re better but I don’t trust any company to make one that doesn’t do something shitty. This is irrational past a certain point however, there is no reason non-electric cars won’t be programmed to do shitty things to? This is Xenophobia wrapped up in our emotions around cars, there is little evidence that Electric Vehicles are more vulnerable to being hacked than other kinds of cars, the reason everyone is nervous about this is that “western” car makers are being left in the dust because of their own stupid choices and everyone feels anxious about it. This is how it manifests, a general mistrust in electric vehicles we intuitively seem to have that is a mirage obscuring feelings of insecurity about our own societies.
Open parent Original URL
0
0
0
@grue@lemmy.world on lemmy.world Open parent
This is irrational past a certain point however, there is no reason non-electric cars won’t be programmed to do shitty things to? If you’re comparing new electric cars to new internal-combustion cars, sure. But old internal-combustion cars are a non-enshittified option too, and unfortunately, there’s no such thing as an old [mass-market] electric car. If I could have, say, a GM EV1, or a 2001 Ford Ranger EV, or a 2001 Rav4 EV, or something like that (but with the NiMH batteries swapped for modern lithium ones), I’d totally get an EV. But those cars were all low-volume production when they were new, and are surely even harder to get a hold of now.
Open parent Original URL
0
0
0
@speculate7383@lemmy.today on lemmy.today Open parent
The Nissan Leaf is perhaps what you missed. My 2015 Leaf still has 80% SOC on its pack (75 mile range) so it is quite usable for 98% of my driving. It did have Nissan telemetry, but they’ve phased that out for the old Leafs, plus I simply removed the SIM. Parts available everywhere, third-party independent mechanics know the cars, and there are multiple companies offering battery upgrades, as well.
Open parent Original URL
0
0
0
0
grue in !climate
@grue@lemmy.world · 14d
I didn’t miss the Leaf, but I had ruled it out because of the telemetry. This… but they’ve phased that out for the old Leafs …is news to me. Got a source where I can read more?
View on lemmy.world
0
2
0
Sign in to interact

Comments (2)

Showing 0 of 2 cached locally.
Syncing comments from the remote thread. 2 more replies are still loading.

Loading comments...

About Community

climate
Climate
!climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

8549
Members
12811
Posts
Created: June 11, 2023
View All Posts
313k7r1n3

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • VPN Policy

Email Settings

IMAP: mail.elektrine.com:993

POP3: pop3.elektrine.com:995

SMTP: mail.elektrine.com:465

SSL/TLS required

Support

  • support@elektrine.com
  • Report Security Issue

Connect

Tor Hidden Service

khav7sdajxu6om3arvglevskg2vwuy7luyjcwfwg6xnkd7qtskr2vhad.onion
© 2026 Elektrine. All rights reserved. • Server: 21:15:00 UTC