• Sign in
  • Sign up
Elektrine
EN
  • EN English
  • 中 中文
Log in Register
Modes
Overview Search Chat Timeline Communities Gallery Lists Friends Email Vault VPN
Back to Timeline
  • Open on lemmy.world

AutistoMephisto

@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
lemmy 0.19.16-6-g1f680600c
0 Followers
0 Following
Joined September 04, 2023

Posts

AutistoMephisto
AutistoMephisto
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
AutistoMephisto
AutistoMephisto
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world in technology · Dec 23, 2025

The Algorithm Finally Works For You

Interesting piece. The author claims that LLMs like Claude and ChatGPT are mere interfaces for the same kind of algorithms that corporations have been using for decades and that the real “AI Revolution” is that regular people have access to them, where before we did not. From the article: Consider what it took to use business intelligence software in 2015. You needed to buy the software, which cost thousands or tens of thousands of dollars. You needed to clean and structure your data. You needed to learn SQL or tableau or whatever visualization tool you were using. You needed to know what questions to ask. The cognitive and financial overhead was high enough that only organizations bothered. Language models collapsed that overhead to nearly zero. You don’t need to learn a query language. You don’t need to structure your data. You don’t need to know the right technical terms. You just describe what you want in plain English. The interface became conversation.
View on lemmy.world
0
0
0
0
Thread context 3 posts in path
Root @AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world Open
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
Open ancestor post
Parent @CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world Open
@CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
Something any (real, trained, educated) developer who has even touched AI in their career could have told you.
Current reply
Boosted by Technology @technology@lemmy.world
AutistoMephisto
AutistoMephisto
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
AutistoMephisto
AutistoMephisto
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world in technology · Dec 07, 2025
What’s funny is this guy has 25 years of experience as a software developer. But three months was all it took to make it worthless.
View full thread on lemmy.world
0
0
0
0
Thread context 3 posts in path
Root @AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world Open
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
Open ancestor post
Parent @edgemaster72@lemmy.world Open
@edgemaster72@lemmy.world
Not immediate failure—that’s the trap. Initial metrics look great. You ship faster. You feel productive. And all they’ll hear is “not failure, metrics great, ship faster, productive” and go against yo
Current reply
Boosted by Technology @technology@lemmy.world
AutistoMephisto
AutistoMephisto
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
AutistoMephisto
AutistoMephisto
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world in technology · Dec 07, 2025
The top comment on the article points that out. It’s an example of a far older phenomenon: Once you automate something, the corresponding skill set and experience atrophy. It’s a problem that predates LLMs by quite a bit. If the only experience gained is with the automated system, the skills are never acquired. I’ll have to find it but there’s a story about a modern fighter jet pilot not being able to handle a WWII era Lancaster bomber. They don’t know how to do the stuff that modern warplanes do automatically.
View full thread on lemmy.world
0
0
0
0
Thread context 3 posts in path
Root @AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world Open
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
Open ancestor post
Parent @just_another_person@lemmy.world Open
@just_another_person@lemmy.world
No shit
Current reply
Boosted by Technology @technology@lemmy.world
AutistoMephisto
AutistoMephisto
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
AutistoMephisto
AutistoMephisto
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world in technology · Dec 07, 2025
What’s interesting is what he found out. From the article: I forced myself to use Claude Code exclusively to build a product. Three months. Not a single line of code written by me. I wanted to experience what my clients were considering—100% AI adoption. I needed to know firsthand why that 95% failure rate exists. I got the product launched. It worked. I was proud of what I’d created. Then came the moment that validated every concern in that MIT study: I needed to make a small change and realized I wasn’t confident I could do it. My own product, built under my direction, and I’d lost confidence in my ability to modify it.
View full thread on lemmy.world
0
0
0
0
Boosted by Technology @technology@lemmy.world
AutistoMephisto
AutistoMephisto
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
AutistoMephisto
AutistoMephisto
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world in technology · Dec 07, 2025

I Went All-In on AI. The MIT Study Is Right.

View on lemmy.world
0
0
1
0
313k7r1n3

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • VPN Policy

Email Settings

IMAP: imap.elektrine.com:993

POP3: pop.elektrine.com:995

SMTP: smtp.elektrine.com:465

SSL/TLS required

Support

  • support@elektrine.com
  • Report Security Issue

Connect

Tor Hidden Service

khav7sdajxu6om3arvglevskg2vwuy7luyjcwfwg6xnkd7qtskr2vhad.onion
© 2026 Elektrine. All rights reserved. • Server: 05:47:42 UTC