CandleTiger

Do you ever wear neatly crisply pressed and ironed business-formal shorts to work?

Presumably if there’s a switch to turn it on then there’s also a switch to turn it back off again.

Boiling it must kill the elastic on the white cotton underwear in fewer washes And the elastic on the fitted sheets. And… sometimes I like to wear underwear with blue penguins on it… Granted it’s hygienic but the rest of the world appears to find regular soap and warm water to be sufficiently hygienic without boiling. I’m not saying Germans are wrong I’m only saying Germans are exceedingly more German than other people are.

We don’t boil our clothes. Like, what the shit? That’s just you. Your underwear is not going to last very long if you treat it that way. Germans are weird about laundry.

Check out the excellent tutorial # Learn Rust With Entirely Too Many Linked Lists especially chapters five and six. It has a lot more words, it’s entertaining, engaging, and informative.

But if you are doing something advanced, down at the hardware level This part is wrong. Otherwise yes correct. The “unsafe” code in rust is allowed to access memory locations in ways that skip the compiler’s check and guarantee that that memory location has valid data. They programmer is on their own to ensure that. Which as you say is just the normal state of affairs for all C code. This is needed not because of hardware access but just because sometimes the proof that the access is safe is beyond what the compiler is able to represent.