Cekan14
@Cekan14@lemmy.org
lemmy
0.19.11
0
Followers
0
Following
Joined February 28, 2026
Posts
Cekan14
@Cekan14@lemmy.org
lemmy.org
As a rule of thumb, should I pick the Debian package or the Flatpak version of a given programme?
I run Debian 13 Stable with KDE Plasma, and have Flathub enabled on KDE’s Discover software store. I have a slight idea of the difference between the two: that Debian packages share system libraries and are therefore lighter in storage but do require password to access those shared libraries and could therefore become a security hazard if installing from an untrusted source, while Flatpaks have all they need and don’t require password to install, being more secure that way, but, as a consequence, consume more storage. Also noticeable is the fact that, for some programmes, the Flatpak version tends to be more recent and it therefore becomes the obvious choice when looking for the latest software.
However, I was looking at the SuperTux game, and what’s curious about this is that both, the Debian package and the Flatpak are version 0.6.3, while consuming 6.7 and 259,9 MB of storage respectively.
So should the obvious choice here be the Debian package, or would you still go for the Flatpak? I am not asking this because I’m particularly interested on this game as much as to learn more about the two system packages and whether my assumptions are correct or I am missing something.
Thank you and have a nice weekend!
View on lemmy.org
40
37
0
0
Thread context
2 posts in path
Parent
@doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
Open
@doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
My biggest gripe about the default GNOME settings
Current reply
Cekan14
@Cekan14@lemmy.org
lemmy.org
Are there any sickos that use black text on white?
Hi.
I think the other way around: I read black letters on white paper when I read a book; why shouldn’t it be the same on a screen? I find the black background more fatiguing for the eyes.
View full thread on lemmy.org
0
6
0
0
Thread context
2 posts in path
Parent
@CarlLandry357@lemmy.world
Open
@CarlLandry357@lemmy.world
Isn’t just awkward that you use a different app? How do you explain?
Current reply
Cekan14
@Cekan14@lemmy.org
lemmy.org
It is the superior choice, doesn’t have ads, doesn’t try to sell you shit, it never updates without your permission, it doesn’t spy on you, it doesn’t sell your data, it is the superior choice, and penguins be cute.
View full thread on lemmy.org
0
0
0
0
Cekan14
@Cekan14@lemmy.org
lemmy.org
I am learning about community-based Linux distros as they are my preferred choice compared to corporate ones. And when I get to Fedora, what I see from the fence is a sofisticated, well-supported OS.
However, seeing that it is sponsored by the Red Hat corporation, the question arises: could Red Hat eventually take control of the project? I suppose the answer comes down to how much weight Red Hat actually has on the development of said distro. From what I know, it has employees dedicated full-time to it.
Let’s rephrase the question and say that the Fedora project ditched Red Hat from its development due to some irrepairable decision; how viable would the continuation of the OS development be as compared to, for example, Debian, which is also community-based but, as far as I know, has no such backing from a corporation?
Please, note that, while I am indeed a Debian user, I am not trying in any way to shit on Fedora. I myself am curious to try it out as I have recently arrived to Linux.
View on lemmy.org
0
2
1
0