Chais
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
lemmy
0.19.16
0
Followers
0
Following
Joined June 12, 2023
Posts
Open post
In reply to
Chais
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
in
programmer_humor
·
4d ago
Well that’s one wide open backdoor. More like a back gate, really.
24
1
0
0
Open post
Chais
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
in
lemmyshitpost
·
Apr 09, 2026
Then and now
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
Chais
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
in
technology
·
Apr 08, 2026
And you believed that??
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
Chais
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
“Senior backend engineer” tells us it’s likely backend software development, which is mostly platform agnostic. NodeJS, PHP, Python or whatever language you want to write your backend in can be developed on any OS. Even C#, unless you insist on specific versions.
The limitation to Windows as a developer OS was likely not communicated in the job advert or during the interview process and was only revealed when the developer machine was requested.
Going purely on phrasing, Devin seems to be head of IT. So this may be his call to make, but this will alienate some candidates, as we can see.
Software development on Windows is a uniquely frustrating experience. Nowadays it can mostly be sidestepped with WSL, but that still leaves you “using” an OS that you will have to fight frequently.
The limitation to Windows as a developer OS was likely not communicated in the job advert or during the interview process and was only revealed when the developer machine was requested.
Going purely on phrasing, Devin seems to be head of IT. So this may be his call to make, but this will alienate some candidates, as we can see.
Software development on Windows is a uniquely frustrating experience. Nowadays it can mostly be sidestepped with WSL, but that still leaves you “using” an OS that you will have to fight frequently.
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
Chais
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
in
lemmyshitpost
·
Mar 07, 2026
Ingesting then counts as consent. It’s like those banners reading: “By continuing to use this site you agree to our privacy policy.”
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
Chais
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
Nice attempt at reductio ad absurdum. Here, let me try, too:
Since we already outsourced all the parenting, I guess you think we should all proliferate like rabbits to further feed the machine. How’s that?
OK, now that we got that out of our respective systems, no I’m not opposed to school.
I think as a species we’ve moved well past the point where a single person could reasonably possess, let alone teach all the knowledge that might be relevant to any single person’s life.
I’d also argue that, while adjacent, education is not parenting. Someone can be a teacher to someone without being their parent. Literal well as figurative.
But educators definitely require parents’ help and support, otherwise teaching really turns into an uphill battle against unwilling brats.
The point I was alluding to is, that I think it’s impossible to shield children from all the “harmful information” on the internet. Not without turning it into a totalitarian nightmare, and even then I’m not convinced you could fully prevent children occasionally setting “something bad”. But you’d surveil the entire population and criminalise perfectly harmless actions in the process.
Instead I think it’s the parents’ responsibility to prepare their children and contextualise the information they’ll doubtlessly come across. They can maybe delay the inevitable with parental control software, but that’s their responsibility and if they’re technologically inept that’s also their problem. Existing laws are perfectly sufficient, if not already overreaching.
I refuse to give up civil liberties because you’re afraid to talk to your kids about porn.
Since we already outsourced all the parenting, I guess you think we should all proliferate like rabbits to further feed the machine. How’s that?
OK, now that we got that out of our respective systems, no I’m not opposed to school.
I think as a species we’ve moved well past the point where a single person could reasonably possess, let alone teach all the knowledge that might be relevant to any single person’s life.
I’d also argue that, while adjacent, education is not parenting. Someone can be a teacher to someone without being their parent. Literal well as figurative.
But educators definitely require parents’ help and support, otherwise teaching really turns into an uphill battle against unwilling brats.
The point I was alluding to is, that I think it’s impossible to shield children from all the “harmful information” on the internet. Not without turning it into a totalitarian nightmare, and even then I’m not convinced you could fully prevent children occasionally setting “something bad”. But you’d surveil the entire population and criminalise perfectly harmless actions in the process.
Instead I think it’s the parents’ responsibility to prepare their children and contextualise the information they’ll doubtlessly come across. They can maybe delay the inevitable with parental control software, but that’s their responsibility and if they’re technologically inept that’s also their problem. Existing laws are perfectly sufficient, if not already overreaching.
I refuse to give up civil liberties because you’re afraid to talk to your kids about porn.
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
Chais
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
You seem opposed to the idea of parents doing actual parenting.
But for that matter, apparently so do many parents. They’d rather outsource the issue to the government, the operating system, the operator of whatever platform the kids happen to be using, complete strangers, literally anyone but themselves.
Anything to avoid talking to their offspring about porn, violence, drugs or whatever else.
But for that matter, apparently so do many parents. They’d rather outsource the issue to the government, the operating system, the operator of whatever platform the kids happen to be using, complete strangers, literally anyone but themselves.
Anything to avoid talking to their offspring about porn, violence, drugs or whatever else.
0
3
0
0
Open post
In reply to
Chais
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
I suggest [RFC 2549: IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service
](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2549)
](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2549)
3
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
Chais
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
in
technology
·
Feb 26, 2026
*farther
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
Chais
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@Chais@sh.itjust.works
in
technology
·
Dec 04, 2025
Exactly. It only has to beat the user by a small margin.
1
0
0
0