Thread context
4 posts in path
Root
@cstross@wandering.shop
Open
@cstross@wandering.shop
LLMs are spam generators. That is all. They're designed to generate plausibly human-like text well enough to pass a generic Turing Test. That's why people believe they're "intelligent". But really, al
Ancestor 2
@ViennaMike@mastodon.social
Open
@ViennaMike@mastodon.social
@cstross@wandering.shop Love your fiction, can't agree on this take. Spam does not help with writing code, whereas LLM's can be extremely helpful. LLM's are not generally intelligent. They can be imme
Parent
@cstross@wandering.shop
Open
@cstross@wandering.shop
@ViennaMike@mastodon.social You're using code generators. Not the same thing, frankly. Stop generalizing your experience as a developer to the public at large, who only see magic talking box.
Computer and electronics hobbyist. Intelligent Transportation Systems consultant. He / Him
mastodon.social
Computer and electronics hobbyist. Intelligent Transportation Systems consultant. He / Him
mastodon.social
@ViennaMike@mastodon.social
·
Jan 16, 2026
@cstross@wandering.shop So the experience of developers who have found significant value from the use of LLM's doesn't count or isn't valid?
Used to WRITE material, they aren't great. But to organize, summarize, do research and help brainstorm, they can be useful.
While ChatGPT currently can't pass the IRS' volunteer tax assessor's exam (see
https://www.mcgurrin.info/robots/8298/) I have confidence that a RAG based system could do so.
Heck, COMPUTERS are magic to most people, as are the internet, radios and TV.
View full thread on mastodon.social