• Sign in
  • Sign up
Elektrine
EN
Log in Register
Modes
Overview Chat Timeline Communities Gallery Lists Friends Email Vault DNS VPN
Back to Timeline
  • Open on lemmy.ml

cyberwolfie

@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy 0.19.18-beta.1
0 Followers
0 Following
Joined July 21, 2023

Posts

Open post
In reply to
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
cyberwolfie
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml · Apr 05, 2026

Most likely something on that channel is spamming multicast. That kills most consumer wifi routers (in default settings). Usually something like a sonos or Google home broadcast group.

I might (i.e. I definitely do) have a non-ideal setup at home that contributes to this, with the router/WPA, a RPi running HA with a Zigbee antenna just next to it, my server in the shelf next over and a Sonos above it. Worst of all, the server is running on WiFi and it is sat in immediate vicinity to my router. Why? Because I could not for the life of me make the ethernet transfer speeds be more than somewhere around 1-5 MiB/s, so I gave up. But considering these issues are so infrequent from this location I assume it is mostly due to outside interference.

And adding to that, ….

Use an app like PingTools (Android) that can graph what is on each wifi channel. Check to find the cleanest channels in your area and configure your router to use that channel.

… this scan shows that all discovered networks are occupying the same channels (98-114 it looks like). I have still not figured out what OpenWRT option to go for (the OpenWRT One, which I had originally planned, quickly became very expensive with imports and tolls that I ended up not buying, despite having decided to go for it). So I am using the stock ISP router, which I assume everyone else in my building are as well. And I have been unable to locate an option to change channels in its interface.

If you’re curious and technically-minded, I highly recommend this write up: https://www.wiisfi.com/

That is a resource I didn’t know I needed! Thanks :)

View full thread on lemmy.ml
3
4
0
0
Open post
In reply to
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
cyberwolfie
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml in linux · Apr 05, 2026
Ah, that would make sense. I think my immediate neighbors are home, but about half of my building should be traveling for Easter (judging by the empty parking garage at least).
View full thread on lemmy.ml
0
1
0
0
Open post
In reply to
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
cyberwolfie
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml · Apr 05, 2026

I use this:

rsync -rah --progress /path/on/source/ user@ip.of.local.server:/path/on/destination

I will try the ping next time I attempt this. There doesn’t seem to be a definite time when the issues start though. It tries to copy the file over, and when it is done it continues to the next. If the first one didn’t succeed, it will retry and if that also fails, it will say “ERROR verification failed - discarding update” (paraphrased) and continue to retry the next file if that also failed.

I do see some fluctuations in the transfer speeds during transfer, which could indicate the times the connection is struggling.

View full thread on lemmy.ml
1
2
0
0
Open post
In reply to
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
cyberwolfie
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml · Apr 05, 2026
Makes sense that it would be able to, especially considering the flag that allows you to force an older version as the sender. Still find it strange that on equal version numbers they default to different protocol numbers. I would have at least thought there was an easy way to tell it which protocol version to use by default, but I have at least not been able to find out how.
View full thread on lemmy.ml
1
2
0
0
Open post
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
cyberwolfie
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml in linux · Apr 05, 2026

rsync - same application version, but different protocol versions?

I have a setup that involves syncing files from my laptop to a server regularly. This has been working pretty well for a long time, apart from the odd verification failures. Both machines are WiFi-connected, so when I attempt to sync from a room far away from the WAP, the failure rates for larger files are higher, I would guess due to packet losses. Today, I am sitting at the same spot I usually do this successfully with no issues, and I get errors after errors after errors. The odd one will go through after multiple tries, but generally it is just not working properly. I also got a broken pipe today during one attempt. This is not the first time it happens, and I feel crazy for thinking it is correlated to do bad weather, as if that should somehow affect my indoor WiFi quality… Anyways, I tried to look at the rsync versions on the sender and receiver, and noticed that while both are the same application version number (3.2.7), they operate on different protocol versions (sender: 31, receiver: 32). I found this a bit odd, and I was unable to figure out how I would force my laptop to also use protocol version 32. I know I can pass a –protocol=NUM argument, but that seems to be used to force the sender to use an older version in case the receiver only has an older version, which is the opposite of my current situation. And what is the likelihood that this is the cause of my woes?
View on lemmy.ml
30
29
0
0
Open post
In reply to
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
cyberwolfie
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml · Apr 03, 2026
I just joined an old-school phpBB forum dedicated to a specific topic, and it is glorious.
View full thread on lemmy.ml
3
7
0
0
Open post
Boosted by Technology @technology@lemmy.world
In reply to
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
cyberwolfie
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml in technology · Dec 13, 2025
Being one of the best paid traders in the world does not necessarily qualify you to advise the government… There are plenty of morons who (for some time) are able to make a killing as a trader due to taking excessive risks and being sufficiently lucky for some stretch of time.
View full thread on lemmy.ml
0
0
0
0
Open post
Boosted by Technology @technology@lemmy.world
In reply to
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
cyberwolfie
cyberwolfie
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
lemmy.ml
@cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml in technology · Dec 06, 2025
Because line go up
View full thread on lemmy.ml
0
0
0
0
313k7r1n3

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • VPN Policy

Email Settings

IMAP: mail.elektrine.com:993

POP3: pop3.elektrine.com:995

SMTP: mail.elektrine.com:465

SSL/TLS required

Support

  • support@elektrine.com
  • Report Security Issue

Connect

Tor Hidden Service

khav7sdajxu6om3arvglevskg2vwuy7luyjcwfwg6xnkd7qtskr2vhad.onion
© 2026 Elektrine. All rights reserved. • Server: 14:45:09 UTC