hector

A bad precedent. No concession! Fuck these nihlists! We have freedom of speech, and the supreme court and congress and the executive does not have the authority to take it from us. Fuck them.

Greetings Jesus!

Which is why we all should aspire to join linux, and reject newsome and other greasy california politicians cynically playing us for the billionaires.

The came out with vanadium batteries for some heavy industrial operations as well a number of years back.

I think they did this first, at least they passed the law first. Our “left center” government in action.

I would take it a step further, ban them from the EU, yes Switzerland is separate from them, then put sanctions on countries that do use them, to prevent palantir scooping up their information in countries like the UK. The way this digital surveillance works they can get a lot of information on Europeans because the UK has given them base access to their compromised internet. Something that’s been ongoing for like 15 years at least. The UK was at the cusp of changing their internet providing to give their government’s contractors unchecked access to it at a base level, or so I read 15 some years ago. Obviously they are taking that compromising to another level with age checks and masterbaitorbases and forcing users to hand biometrics and id to private interests that will connect every account with everything said and looked at with all of the cameras and microphones and facial recognition and make social scores on everyone to be used against them secretly in ways you won’t be told about and cannot challenge. Half baked threat detection being run by the company owned by the guy that wants to spray his opponents and critics with fentanyl by drone, his words.

You lost all credibility early on in your first statement, to anyone living in reality paying attention, your analysis is worth nothing.

The courts should strike it down, I don’t have faith they will side with the constitution, but it’s clearly unconstititional and beyond the authority of the state as well, in the realm of interstate commerce which is explicitly given to the feds, whom can’t be trusted either obviously. But the 1st amendment is clearly invalidating this, forcing people to identify themselves to groups that will record everything they say or do and sell it to everyone, including the government, that will chill speech, and groups will punish people for their speech. Too bad scotus is all in on punishing people for speech though.

Colorodo democrats have always been lousy. Here they are following texas and montana and tennessee, locking down the internet with dishonest arguments. No one in reality thinks this is about protecting kids, and it’s not the state’s place to do so, it’s the parents, it’s a violation of the 1st amendment to make adults expose their identities to people recording everything they do online and using it against them, and selling it to the government. We need to repeal these bills, and we need a popular open source of model legislation to counter-act ALEC, that writes these bills and state lawmakers just fill in the blanks, after the united corporations give them a plausible excuse to and pay them off

The biggest problem to getting open source textbooks, is McGraw Hill and their ilk, the few companies that control the textbook Rackets.

It’s more than just lack of effort here though, it’s systematic pollution they are allowing into our food and water with abandon.