Matthew Skala
1. Pet catgirl.
2. Record purr.
3. Build synthesizer.
Posts
1. Pet catgirl. 2. Record purr. 3. Build synthesizer. https:// matthewexplains.com 日本語のアカウントは @ mattskala
1. Pet catgirl. 2. Record purr. 3. Build synthesizer. https:// matthewexplains.com 日本語のアカウントは @ mattskala
1. Pet catgirl. 2. Record purr. 3. Build synthesizer. https:// matthewexplains.com 日本語のアカウントは @ mattskala
1. Pet catgirl. 2. Record purr. 3. Build synthesizer. https:// matthewexplains.com 日本語のアカウントは @ mattskala
Research result: it is easy to convince Google Gemma that it is under the influence of "AI cocaine," but you probably shouldn't, because it gets really annoying.
1. Pet catgirl. 2. Record purr. 3. Build synthesizer. https:// matthewexplains.com 日本語のアカウントは @ mattskala
1. Pet catgirl. 2. Record purr. 3. Build synthesizer. https:// matthewexplains.com 日本語のアカウントは @ mattskala
1. Pet catgirl. 2. Record purr. 3. Build synthesizer. https:// matthewexplains.com 日本語のアカウントは @ mattskala
1. Pet catgirl. 2. Record purr. 3. Build synthesizer. https:// matthewexplains.com 日本語のアカウントは @ mattskala
1. Pet catgirl. 2. Record purr. 3. Build synthesizer. https:// matthewexplains.com 日本語のアカウントは @ mattskala
1. Pet catgirl. 2. Record purr. 3. Build synthesizer. https:// matthewexplains.com 日本語のアカウントは @ mattskala
1. Pet catgirl. 2. Record purr. 3. Build synthesizer. https:// matthewexplains.com 日本語のアカウントは @ mattskala
1. Pet catgirl. 2. Record purr. 3. Build synthesizer. https:// matthewexplains.com 日本語のアカウントは @ mattskala
Proposition: Index funds are AIs.
I don't mean "someone is using a neural network to run what they call an 'index fund,'" which is no doubt true, but uninteresting. I mean the conventional kind of index fund, based on an actual index, is already an AI itself.
It's making decisions based on the statistical aggregation of a massive collection of recorded human decisions. Training that model looks easy because the structure of the market does most of the work of collecting the data, but /