plantfanatic

That’s just watered down lotion…

That link shows them using it with shoes on for what it’s worth.

The contingency is not serve the products instead of producing sub par and different food in the mean time.

The replacement wouldn’t be the same dude, that’s the entire issue to being with and why they would never even entertain the idea to begin with. It’s gonna taste different. Full stop.

They know it’s an option, it’s just the worst one. You don’t seriously think you came up with some novel idea they haven’t mulled over before have you?

That takes MONTHS dude….

You seriously have no concept on how restaurants operate.

Ah yes, use an unknown potentially inferior product and lose your customers from the lack of quality and consistency.

There’s a reason they use single procurement, consistency.

It’s STILL like that. I’m sorry for explaining why they specifically do something.


You wouldn’t use the librarian as a source, but all the books she told you about can be listed. Then write what they said and see if they notice.


Same situation, different era.

Wikipedia pages are synopsis’s and have a viewpoint of the person writing them. You use wiki like a library to find the sources to use and cite.


Why would they suggest and tell you how to “cheat” the system? If you’re not smart enough to realize Wikipedia isn’t a source itself, you are exactly why this lesson needs to be done lmfao.


Wiki would be like asking the librarian what the book is about, then using them as the source, you realize how silly this sounds now yeah?

Instead of listing the source on wiki, why not just use hard link and avoid wiki to being with?


The point of the lesson is to hide your tracks or show that you’re not completely lazy. Would you just list “library” as a source? They don’t care you use wiki, they care you incorrectly listing sources.

There was also some Korean lady doing a bunch of Russian history for a decade.


Edit


Linky

Part of being open source is subsequent licensing. This would allow any others to piggyback and avoid the fee.

I don’t know what AI is, but I’m going to talk like I’m an expert.



Yes I’ve already addressed your asinine view.

Seriously? A chatbot is one function of an ai, not the other way around. So when you give the ai a different ask or set of instructions, it’s no longer the chatbot anymore, it’s whatever function that’s needed for that task.


I weep for humanity if you’re any indication of the general education on ai….

. I am not talking about other types of machine learning.



Then you are making up you own conversation instead of following the thread?


The person presented a specific task to an AI, where does a chatbot come in?

Yet that wasn’t the point they even made! Lmfao nice reaching there.

But they didn’t ask it a question… They specifically told it the image was fake and explain why. That’s not a question, that’s a task.


The lack of basic reading comprehension being shown here excerpt explains the issue perfectly.


It’s not people relying on it, it’s people using it for stuff it’s not meant for!

It’s not a conversation tool when you present it with a specific task….

Then what are doing? Complaining it did exactly what you instructed it to do?


What else did you expect?

Why would it have to? It knows to do any task put in front of it.


A human would to.

Wait, you’re surprised it did what you asked of it?


There’s a massive difference between asking if something is fake and telling it it is, and asking why.


A person would make the same type of guesses and explanations.


All this is showing is, you and ALOT of other people just don’t know enough about AI to be able to have a conversation about it.

Steel pipe with a print around it would work too.