In reply to
💙💛:~/eu/pl/priv$
@miklo@fosstodon.org
🇪🇺 🇵🇱 ♂️ IT geek. # privacy # security # fediverse # foss # b3d # mxlinux # gis # openstreetmap # opencaching # hamradio # freeflying # solarigraphy # CreativeCommons # sustainability # hackerspace # retrocomputing # selfhosting # nobot # noai Admin of soc.citizen4.eu Public posts under CC-BY-NC-SA license
fosstodon.org
💙💛:~/eu/pl/priv$
@miklo@fosstodon.org
🇪🇺 🇵🇱 ♂️ IT geek. # privacy # security # fediverse # foss # b3d # mxlinux # gis # openstreetmap # opencaching # hamradio # freeflying # solarigraphy # CreativeCommons # sustainability # hackerspace # retrocomputing # selfhosting # nobot # noai Admin of soc.citizen4.eu Public posts under CC-BY-NC-SA license
fosstodon.org
@miklo@fosstodon.org
·
Mar 30, 2026
@danb But they're right that, according to Section 7 of AGPLv3, the copyright holder is expressly entitled to impose additional conditions. So the “Euro-Office” project might be forced not to remove their logo. But I don't think that's an issue. Usually, FOSS projects have the opposite requirements—that forks must not use the original project's trademarked branding.
View full thread on fosstodon.org
0
1
0
Conversation (1)
Showing 0 of 1 cached locally.
Syncing comments from the remote thread. 1 more reply is still loading.
Loading comments...