In reply to
kechpaja
@kechpaja@social.kechpaja.com
Conlanging/Linguistics/Polyglotism/Linux/Sometimes music Dual US/FI citizen who doesn't really do gender. Trans as in transhumanist, transatlantic and transfluvial. I'm "kechpaja" pretty much anywhere you see that username. Personal (but public!) account; for Finnish politics see @ puujalkavihrea .
social.kechpaja.com
kechpaja
@kechpaja@social.kechpaja.com
Conlanging/Linguistics/Polyglotism/Linux/Sometimes music Dual US/FI citizen who doesn't really do gender. Trans as in transhumanist, transatlantic and transfluvial. I'm "kechpaja" pretty much anywhere you see that username. Personal (but public!) account; for Finnish politics see @ puujalkavihrea .
social.kechpaja.com
@kechpaja@social.kechpaja.com
·
Apr 03, 2026
Not in as many words, although there have definitely been pro-AI talking points where the idea that it helps you utilize existing code more effectively has come up.
But what I'm really responding to an implicit question that I've had to answer for myself, about where the line between rejecting AI because it's AI and rejecting _other people's code_ is. Perhaps when I get a free moment I should insert a paragraph elucidating that.
View full thread on social.kechpaja.com
0
0
0
Loading comments...