slacktoid
@slacktoid@lemmy.ml
lemmy
0.19.18-beta.1
Self-hoster/FOSS Pronouns: He/Him
0
Followers
0
Following
Joined August 18, 2021
Posts
Open post
Open post
Open post
In reply to
@slacktoid@lemmy.ml
in
technology
·
Dec 16, 2025
They are just fork + patches, I think only one is maintained by the company that forked it but it’s an esr version and it’s an ad company.
View full thread on lemmy.ml
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
@slacktoid@lemmy.ml
in
technology
·
Dec 16, 2025
There’s are 2 main browsers, Firefox and Chromium. chromium has a monopoly due to Google, edge, brave, etc. This monopoly allows Google as they dictate what happens to the chromium project, some implementations for features were never incorporated as it didn’t suit Google like JPEG-XL. Even tho its open source its main contributors are from Google. Google dictated the change to manifest v2 to ruin adblockers as it impacts their revenue.
This decision impacted all other chromium forks. I think all of them (maybe except brave cause they may have the engineering bandwidth) now lack maifest v2 support. All because a corporate entity decided it was better if users didn’t have adblocking capabilities.
They have even made changes to their implementations of various standards (HTML etc) and since most webdevs only test on Chromium, you end up with a subpar experience if you’re not using Google or Chromiums implementation of that standard.
So my question as I stated earlier. What’s the alternative to Firefox since even the alternatives are dependent on the work done by Firefox for their fork.
And going to chromium is just allowing your core browsing experience (like adblocking) to be dictated by google.
View full thread on lemmy.ml
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
@slacktoid@lemmy.ml
in
technology
·
Dec 16, 2025
Not defending but what’s the alternative to the chromium monopoly?
Most Firefox forks people talk about are a fork of the Firefox version + some patches. You’re better off using Phoenix instead of those forks IMO.
View full thread on lemmy.ml
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
@slacktoid@lemmy.ml
in
technology
·
Dec 10, 2025
But again that’s not related to a committee stopping the implementation of a standard. It’s a scale of production issue, a labelling issue, and a consumer protection issue.
And I like having one port to just dock my machine in for power and display. I do understand how a separate port can help but I don’t see why we can’t have USB C working to its designed spec apart from the reasons I listed above.
View full thread on lemmy.ml
7
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
@slacktoid@lemmy.ml
in
technology
·
Dec 10, 2025
Buy a supported cable? That’s a cable issue not a standards or forums issue
View full thread on lemmy.ml
11
3
0
0
Open post
In reply to
@slacktoid@lemmy.ml
in
technology
·
Dec 05, 2025
Oh boy it’s hunting season
View full thread on lemmy.ml
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
Setup a matrix bridge for WhatsApp. Run WhatsApp on a VM when you need to open the app. Tell them you don’t have calls which they will get on signal.
View full thread on lemmy.ml
0
0
0
0