yes_this_time
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
lemmy
0.19.17-8-gded733659
0
Followers
0
Following
Joined April 29, 2024
Posts
Open post
In reply to
yes_this_time
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
yes_this_time
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
in
technology
·
Apr 10, 2026
firerover.com/…/how-often-do-ev-batteries-catch-f…
ICE vehicles have far more fires. EVs are more intense, but significantly less frequent
View full thread on lemmy.world
0
1
0
0
Open post
In reply to
yes_this_time
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
yes_this_time
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
in
technology
·
Dec 16, 2025
Yeah, after reading a bit into it. It seems like most of the work is up front, pre filtering and classifying before it hits the model, to your point the model training part is expensive…
I think broadly though, the idea that they are just including the kitchen sink into the models without any consideration of source quality isn’t true
View full thread on lemmy.world
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
yes_this_time
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
yes_this_time
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
in
technology
·
Dec 15, 2025
Good points.
What’s novel information vs. wrong information? (And subtly wrong is harder to understand than very wrong)
At some point it’s hitting a user who is giving feedback, but I imagine data lineage once it gets to the end user its tricky to understand.
View full thread on lemmy.world
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
yes_this_time
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
yes_this_time
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@yes_this_time@lemmy.world
in
technology
·
Dec 15, 2025
If I’m creating a corpus for an LLM to consume, I feel like I would probably create some data source quality score and drop anything that makes my model worse.
View full thread on lemmy.world
0
0
0
0