Elektrine
Log in Register

#facialrecognition

6 posts · Last used 3d

Back to Timeline
@inquiline@assemblag.es · 3d ago
deeply disturbing... and according to the local story linked here, she lost her home, car, and dog while locked up https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/12/tennessee-grandmother-ai-fraud #AI #surveillance #FacialRecognition
View on assemblag.es
87
0
163
Boosted by Charlie Stross @cstross@wandering.shop
@Wen@mastodon.scot · Feb 25, 2026
Amusing, when a mistake is made the Polis double down…. I hope he gets significant damages. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/feb/25/facial-recognition-error-prompts-police-to-arrest-asian-man-for-burglary-100-miles-away #FacialRecognition #Bias #ThamesValley #AI
View on mastodon.scot
2
0
3
@RonaldTooTall@universeodon.com · Feb 23, 2026
The current Republican administration is on the road to becoming Orwell's "Big Brother". https://www.wired.com/story/dhs-wants-a-single-search-engine-to-flag-faces-and-fingerprints-across-agencies/ #Privacy #DHS #Immigration #Surveillance #FacialRecognition #BigBrother #TrumpAdministration
View on universeodon.com
0
0
0
@provadivita@mstdn.business · Feb 22, 2026
👁️ Smart glasses with native facial recognition. Residential surveillance networks. License plate tracking. As biometric wearables and AI-powered surveillance tools proliferate, the conversation around consent, oversight, and civil liberties has never been more urgent. Where do we draw the line? 🔗 https://provadivita.com/biometric-injection-attacks/ #BiometricPrivacy #FacialRecognition #SurveillanceTech #DataPrivacy #AIEthics #DigitalRights #BiometricSecurity #EPIC
View on mstdn.business
0
0
2
@itgrrl@infosec.exchange · Feb 22, 2026
the arseholes over at #Meta / #Facebook aren’t clueless & naive techies, they’re actively pursuing harmful & unpopular tech in pursuit of money & power like cartoon villains… 🧐 Meta Plans to Add #FacialRecognition Technology to Its Smart Glasses “Five years ago, Facebook shut down the facial recognition system for tagging people in photos on its social network, saying it wanted to find “the right balance” for a technology that raises #privacy and legal concerns. Now it wants to bring facial recognition back. … Meta’s internal memo said the political tumult in the United States was good timing for the feature’s release. “We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many #CivilSociety groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” according to the document from Meta’s Reality Labs, which works on hardware including smart glasses.” https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/technology/meta-facial-recognition-smart-glasses.html #biometrics #USpol
View on infosec.exchange
9
1
13
Boosted by Darby Lines @angry_drunk@union.place
@Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange · Feb 09, 2026
Each time a new privacy-invasive feature like facial scanning is implemented, if people in majority comply and accept to use it, it will soon become normality, and other options will be marginalized or even removed entirely. If each time a new privacy-invasive feature is implemented people opted to refuse it, it would soon be discontinued. Each individual opposition to privacy-invasive features matters. It is an act of self-protection but, perhaps even more importantly, it is also an act of protest. A protest against the normalization of mass surveillance and the loss of privacy rights. The fact that there are other cameras around doesn't mean that more cameras or additional scanning is not making things even worse. If we do not refuse, if we do not fight for our privacy rights, we will lose them all. #Privacy #MassSurveillance #AgeVerification #FacialRecognition #HumanRights #DigitalRights
View on infosec.exchange
565
0
649

You've seen all posts