I'm listening to the new Flying Lotus EP and it sounds chiptuney AF! Put it on while you read the following essay. I particularly love track 4, In the Forest (Day) https://flyinglotus.bandcamp.com/album/big-mama
In the liner notes FlyLo writes that he wanted the EP to feel "Like a fuckin' computer gone awry. Like a machine that had just lost its mind." It got me thinking about how we return to the 80s/90s computer sounds and visuals when we need to convey that something is "computery" or digital. At the time those aesthetics were governed by technical limitations, now they're creative choices.
On instagram a lot of the viral art and graphics I see mimics or is pixel/ASCII art and some artists, myself included, proudly proclaim that their art was made using old hardware or software. I'm definitely seeing more of this because it's _my_ instgram algorithm tuned to my interests so I would not try and claim this more generally.
With that said what is guiding this creative choice? Of course we can just like 80s/90s aesthetics, but I also think their reinforces the separation of humans and computers. Like, humans inhabit meatspace and computers inhabit cyberspace. I think it says "This _thing_ I created was made using computers and I'm not trying to fool you into thinking otherwise."
I like that, and I prefer computers to be computers.