Thread context
4 posts in path
Root
@Hawanja@lemmy.world
Open
@Hawanja@lemmy.world
Yet another reason to not use any of this AI bullshit
Ancestor 2
@nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Open
@nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
every company ive interviewed with in the last year wants experience with these tools
Parent
@BluesF@lemmy.world
Open
@BluesF@lemmy.world
The company I work for (we make scientific instruments mostly) has been pushing hard to get us to use AI literally anywhere we can. Every time you talk to IT about a project they come back with 10 pro
Boosted by
Technology
@technology@lemmy.world
@mirshafie@europe.pub
in
technology
·
Dec 05, 2025
I think you’re underselling it a bit though. It is far better than a modern search engine, although that is in part because of all of the SEO slop that Google has ingested. The fact that you need to think critically is not something new and it’s never going to go away either. If you were paying real-life human experts to answer your every question you would still need to think for yourself.
Still, I think the C-suite doesn’t really have a good grasp of the limits of LLMs. This could be partly because they themselves work a lot with words and visualization, areas where LLMs show promise. It’s much less useful if you’re in engineering, although I think ultimately AI will transform engineering too. It is of course annoying and potentially destructive that they’re trying to force-push it into areas where it’s not useful (yet).
View full thread on europe.pub