plyth

“… and that’s why I need you to take the power plants offline.”

For those who don’t live in the US and have an electical grid with more than one power plant.

Not anymore.

Has Fox started to bridge the gap?

Dann waren die wohl nicht konkav.

For which future does this make sense? BP should know what the elite is planning to do. The development to EV must be disrupted for this to make sense.

But then why should people feel the need to join the army?

You mean they should let somebody crown himself as emperor and start a land war in asia?

The facebook logo could be loaded from facebook. Then Facebook knows the preferences and can offer more suitable ads, whether the page is shared or not.

A solution without demand is worthless. At first the demand has to be created. Some people value understanding and are thankful but that’s a small minority.

The sales rep offered a solution to that person’s problem. You want that person to be right which they perceive as you want to dominate them. So they try to resist you while they are highly motivated to follow the instructions of the sales person.

Because the billionaires who get them want that to continue. Of course if they are willing to share then there is no need. But the world doesn't look like being run by sharing individuals.

other companies learning to produce the same products

Other companies in China.

Other companies in China cannot be bought and taken off the market.

The big question is: How are western profits going to be protected?

>... They just noticed you don't enlist if you have better options.

Lemmy doesn’t have an active conspiracy channel even though conspiracy theorists should be the first to leave other social networks. Do those conspiracy theorists exist at all?

Think! people, think! Flat earthers are not real but a government operation to discredit all other conspiracy theories.

Do you mean to say that Trump coins are very valuable?

Of course, but that’s usually played down. “Putin and his colleagues were reduced mainly to collecting press clippings, thus contributing to the mountains of useless information produced by the KGB” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin

The propaganda machine that brought you trickle down economics, the private healthcare system, no child left behind schooling, an outstanding military budget and keeps people committed to FPTP voting was beaten by a mid Russian KGB agent?

Once AI controls drones to arrest people automatically there will be no vigilantism.

Are you covered in chocolate?

Would you believe that Denzel had made the call?

So what are the names of the albums for those who want to verify?

OP knows.

Teens can travel alone and setup their phone in France or Ireland, or by their phone from a dealer. All the cool kids will have free phones and be on snapchat, forcing everybody else to follow suit.

Not the real king’s hands without chocolate glazing.

I could literally live on plain potatoes for the rest of my life and I’d be fine with it. You wouldn’t and life would be short. There are not all nutritions in potatoes.

As the wealth divide continues to grow, the richest will continue to care less and less about the rest of us. Of all the things to pick from socialism, expecting the rich to care should be the last one.

Thanks for the feedback. I think there are no other options. The US want to remain the hegemon but China will take the technological lead and thus the military lead soon. Some say already 2027. The US more or less openly plan a naval blockade. But how can they maintain it if they have to ship everything half way accross the world? So they have to beat China. Also because of the shipping distance, China will always have more conventional weapons. The only remaining advantage is nuclear. Even robots seem to be taken over by China. What else can be so abhorent that we need to push the surveillance infrastructure that hard? Freedom is the selling point of the West. Why should countries choose the West over China if we have the same restrictions? We would lose in the long run, unless we use the restrictions to beat China.

The war with China is coming and both the US and the UK want to minimize the impact of protests. It will be inevitably nuclear because China cannot be beaten conventionally. So people will feel a bit compelled to protest which could put to test the usual means of population control.

It’s about surveillance. The nudity is a made-up reason.

That being said, my very important stuff is backed up to more than one cloud provider, just in case. The way things develop, you can’t be sure that you are not banned on all accounts at the same time for political reasons.

I’m not personally yet seeing signs that the logic of MAD is failing Reagan called for a system that would end MAD and render nuclear weapons obsolete.[2] Elements of the program reemerged in 2019 under the Space Development Agency (SDA). en.wikipedia.org/…/Strategic_Defense_Initiative en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starshield Also the thoughts behind tactical nukes.

We are witnessing the death throes of a wounded animal with suicidally inflated ego. Unfortunately, this wounded animal also has nuclear weapons, so it’s a very dangerous time for all of us. So we agree on what is going to happen?

The US must have been thinking about China at least since 1990. Now they fumble the hardest when they need to be the wittiest? I don’t buy it. The US are prepairing to contain China. At best they have AI and robotics first and retake global productions. But I expect a war. It’s difficult to say what the winner will do with a most likely radioactive world. I would expect that there is no need for disinformation, especially if robots do the policing. So those people who survive will have a physical constrained, but intellectually rich life. However, without AI and destroyed knowledge from bombing the civilization centers, technology will fall back to the 1960s or even 1860s, but with internet.

Some comment mentioned that this is for visa free visits whereas visa visits already had that requirement.

I thought that had been required before. What changed?

In the current style of democracy elections can be bought by playing ads to people and by making empty promises until there is a majority. If we need intelligence to make good decisions, but the majority is neither fed well nor educated well, people are trapped. Do you have an idea how things can be changed?

So if everybody is well-fed and educated, we could use it to let only the most intelligent people vote?