zbyte64

I'm sure the kings of the past said the same thing. Funny thing, that's how the left vs right divide started.

Like when the DoJ doesn't release the full video of Epstein's death we get to make any argument we want

New recipe calls to make a stew with the pig still attached to the boot

Every accusation is a confession. Makes me wonder what are you not being honest about here?

And then they go and vote down a bill to stop the war in Iran.

just because of the number of commas in their bank

Having a billion dollars is like having a get out of jail free card. The justice system doesn’t work when the perp has more influence then a prince. Has little to do with them as a person, everything to do with having a functioning democracy.

They said: Demz should win over independent voters You heard: Vote 3rd party Take a moment for yourself.

Two things can be true. Still shouldn't hold a teenager wholly responsible for being scammed.

That's the point. We should not make our children feel bad for not knowing better when we ourselves aren't doing any better. Show some fucking empathy instead of saying you're shit out of luck.

I do get therapy, thanks for the concern random stranger. I hope the same is true for you and that you understand that just because bad things happened to you doesn't mean we should give such things a free pass and make ourselves emotionally unavailable to empathize with our children.

Amazing parenting to let them hurt themselves and their friends because you couldn't educate them well enough to avoid a scam. Edit: I am not saying the parent should have educated the child better, I am just saying when you go down this path of "well you should have known better" then the responsibility is on the parents to teach the kids better.

Exhibit A for why everyone needs therapy. I guess it's little consolation that people reap what they sow.

You know what's also a learning experience? Getting mugged. I hope you learn compassion before you learn that lesson.

Maybe not code but certainly use it to generate more slopspam

It's one of those "every accusation is a confession". People are thinking about themselves when talking about others.

It's what Kirk would have wanted RIP

Opiate addict I talked to said your body was never meant to feel that good. That stuff wrecked my brother (a different addict).

I seriously doubt people are reading this far and confirmed by none of our comments have gotten an up vote this far down. And again, if what you are saying is obvious to all then there’s no need to comment further if you are appealing to an audience. I think this has more to do with either being in control (as evidence by trying to always enforce the boundaries of the conversation even when you yourself violate those same boundaries) or being perceived right by your peers.

If it is as transparent as you say then you wouldn’t have the need to comment any further. So why did you?

Interesting, I didn’t accuse you of being emotional just that you have emotional needs. Everyone has emotional needs. Nonviolent Communication is a great tool for disentangling judgements from needs; for example, calling me dishonest speaks to a need for integrity.

Yeah, I wasn’t asking for your professional opinion on gAI but why you feel the need to attack people’s professional reputation when it can only detract from your argument.

Just as you questioned my intention with accusations of dishonesty I am wondering what your intention is when disparaging a random person’s professional pedigrees (with no effort to make the person known to yourself first). I made my perspective on this known to you and I am trying to understand what your intention was as it does not aide in the debate you so vigilantly protect.

Honestly not sure what I expected in terms of a response but this is certainly an interesting reaction. “Calling someone dishonest is not a personal attack” is certainly a take. It’s also interesting that dishonesty is your automatic conclusion when there are other alternatives when someone approached you with a different professional experience; absent is the tendency of expert practitioners to be curious about contextual clues that can lead to different outcomes. I’m going to take your criticism in good faith and recognize this is probably the standard you hold yourself to: that any part of yourself that does not comport to the current ideal is to be treated with suspicion.

Your description of the tools was to make an inaccurate comparison. But sure, I am the “dangerous” one for showing how your examples are deterministic while gAI is not.

I’ve literally integrated LLMs into a materials optimizations routine at Apple. It’s dangerous to assume what strangers do and do not know.

All the technologies you listed behave deterministically, or at least predictably enough that we generally don’t have to worry about surprises from that abstraction layer. Technology does not just move on, practitioners need to actually find it practical beyond their next project that satisfies the shareholders.

Yes it’s a proxy war. Doesn’t mean you should go around “liberating” your neighbors by folding them into your own territory.

I agree people are selfish but I disagree on where that leads us. Acting as a collective is the best way to be selfish. Billionaires have their collectives: corporations; and if you don’t do the same then you are not even selfish, you are just cattle.