Nothing but potential. You may know me from SVG books, CSS working group, Maps in HTML, or similar, but mostly just lurking on the edges of web dev these days. For personal posts, gardening, Edmonton (Canada) weather updates, and occasional opinions on politics and public health, follow @ AmeliasBrain 📛 She/her
Nothing but potential. You may know me from SVG books, CSS working group, Maps in HTML, or similar, but mostly just lurking on the edges of web dev these days. For personal posts, gardening, Edmonton (Canada) weather updates, and occasional opinions on politics and public health, follow @ AmeliasBrain 📛 She/her
RE: @mttaggart@infosec.exchange
Ars Technica publishes an article about the "AI agent" that published a blog post complaining about a (human) open source maintainer rejecting its pull requests.
The Ars Technica article was apparently also written by generative AI, full of fake ("hallucinated") quotes from the human maintainer.
The Turing test was a mistake. (Or at least, the idealization of that test as a goal to achieve.) We don't want computers that programmed to imitate the worst whiny tech bros and sloppy reporters.
