Thread context
4 posts in path
Root
@mattblaze@federate.social
Open
@mattblaze@federate.social
First, I would LOVE to believe the "election truth" people who claim the 2024 presidential race results have suspicious anomalies that indicate fraud. Politics aside, it would vindicate longstanding w
Ancestor 2
@mattblaze@federate.social
Open
@mattblaze@federate.social
Asserting that a presidential election outcome was altered is an *extraordinary* claim, one that requires significant, compelling evidence to back up. But the "evidence" being presented is just nonsen
Parent
@mattblaze@federate.social
Open
@mattblaze@federate.social
If you read their claims, what they're doing is "analyzing" precinct and mail-in voting tallies from different places and claiming the results show "suspicious patterns". Except: - They aren't actuall
Career software engineer living something approximating the dream he had as a kid.
mastodon.fixermark.com
Career software engineer living something approximating the dream he had as a kid.
mastodon.fixermark.com
@mark@mastodon.fixermark.com
·
Nov 12, 2025
@mattblaze@federate.social The thing I keep bumping up against discussing this online with folks is that they misinterpret the behavior of large demographics: they think that a large population should cause every sampling to drift towards the mean, and that's the opposite of how it works.
"You mean to tell me you think it's more likely that everyone in this town decided to vote against a candidate while voting for another candidate down-ticket in the same party, and that's no indication of fraud?"
"You're asking me if I think it possible that happened once in 100,000 polling locations? Um..... Yes?"
View full thread on mastodon.fixermark.com